The ups and downs of EU energy efficiency policy

Sense and Sensibility

“We shouldn’t invest in energy efficiency because it’s bad for economic growth”, claims Markus Pieper, MEP. All right, he was speaking in German and maybe the EU Parliament’s interpreters were having a tough day. But they can’t have got it completely wrong. He did say saving energy is a bad thing.

What an unhelpful remark. Mr Pieper’s opinions are important, because he is the European People Party’s lead MEP on the Energy Efficiency Directive. And the EPP of course are the top boys in the EU Parliament at the moment, with a third of the seats. So presumably lots of people are now equally misinformed.

Still – fair’s fair – he was simply repeating a common misunderstanding. Most of us instinctively associate energy efficiency with “rationing” (that dreaded word) and believe it is diametrically opposed to growth.

Not true. Saving energy will speed up economic recovery, not hinder it. Defending EU Commission analyses is not something any NGO watchdog does gladly, but there is a time and a place for everything. The Commission has built up a solid case that saving energy is good for economic growth, jobs, the environment and lots of other important things. They call it “less is more” and reckon, for instance, that the 20% by 2020 energy savings target will save Europe €200 billion every year.

Let’s put that number into perspective. Le Monde recently added up the French government’s emergency economy measures for 2012. They came to annual savings of €11 billion. Now set this against France’s fair share of the €200 billion: more than two times more at €25 billion per year.

It’s common sense really, and Mr Pieper should have the savvy to see it. Improving Europe’s energy efficiency means cutting oil and gas import bills (we import over half of our energy). It means spending less to run a business and heat a house. Remember Michael Douglas’s famous line in Wall Street? He said “Greed is good, ladies and gentlemen”. Twisted morals, maybe, but it fits. Spending less on energy means more money for other, more exciting or more useful things. Therefore we need to do everything we can to chase down energy efficiency opportunities. It’s as simple as that.

Time to think again, Mr Pieper. Surely a competitive Europe is something to strive for regardless of your political colours?

By Brook Riley (Friends of the Earth Europe) and Erica Hope (Climate Action Network Europe)

Author :
Print

Comments

  1. PWR has a mind reading section (something we developed after watching “Men who stare at goats” ) and in fact we think we know that what Mr Markus Pieper, MEP probably/perhaps meant and what follows are some rough ideas which expand on his unfinished sentence (with some artistic embellishment):

    Energy efficiency is bad for economic growth …both in the EU AND in countries that export oil and gas to the EU. Declining exports of oil and gas to the EU is bad for these countries because some of them provide finance to worthy causes such as the Taliban freedom fighters (who keep Euro coffin makers in business) and Somalian gunmen who need finance to buy ammo – which of course is needed to combat drought and starvation in Africa (it’s amazing the recipes that area available for bullets).

    From the above, it is transparently clear that less finance to such exemplars of civilisation would be bad for them, bad for Euro coffin makers and indeed the Euro attack industries (well who else do you think provides the ammo and guns?).

    Of course there will be those that complain. For example, minor Euro companies such as Philips and their lighting division, double glazing companies, wall insulation companies and so forth. However, their complaints should not stop us from focusing on helping developing countries (mostly located on the Arabian peninsular) who need our cash to pull their citizens out of poverty whilst at the same time charitably helping unfortunates such as the Taliban and Somalian gunmen.

    So three cheers for Mr Pieper, no to energy efficiency, yes to helping those less fortunate than ourselves, yes to greater dependence on fossil fuels from theocratic dictatorships and yes to keeping freedom fighter and gunmen in business. He certainly has my vote and he is certainly a fine representative of his party.

Comments are closed.